Why Switch

Brine and glycol were never built to last a decade.

Standard heat-transfer fluids corrode the systems they run through. Our ET- fluids are formulated to protect carbon steel, stainless steel, copper and aluminium in the same loop so the fluid outlasts the maintenance schedule built around replacing it.

Corrosion

Near-zero corrosion, independently tested

Our formulations are tested against carbon steel, stainless steel, copper and aluminium, with corrosion rates verified well inside national standard limits. Existing galvanised systems are assessed and disclosed case by case.

Total cost of ownership

Priced by lifetime, not by drum

Commodity glycol is typically replaced every 3-4 years as corrosion and fouling take hold. Our fluids are formulated for 8–10 years of service in a well-maintained closed loop fewer flushes, less downtime, fewer call-outs.

Single-fluid design

One coolant, both directions

A single ET- fluid can carry heat in both directions across a wide operating window, replacing split brine-and-steam arrangements and removing the cross-contamination risk that comes with running two separate media.

At a glance

How ET-4 compares to brine and glycol

The same comparison we walk technical buyers through, using independently verified test data rather than marketing claims.

 Calcium chloride brineEthylene glycolET-4 Coolant
CorrosivitySevere corrosionCorrosionBasically no corrosion
Typical service lifeFrequent replacement as corrosion sets in3–4 years8–10 years in a well-maintained closed loop
Metal compatibilityAttacks carbon steel & most metals over timeCorrodes unprotected metals over timeStainless steel, carbon steel, copper (aluminium in L-grades)
Cost patternLow upfront, high lifecycle cost from leaks & replacementLow upfront, recurring replacement & downtime costModerate upfront, lower lifecycle cost from extended service life
Lab-tested Measured annual corrosion rates for ET-4 come in well inside national standard limits: carbon steel 3.32×10−4 mm/a (standard limit 0.075 mm/a), stainless steel 1.97×10−5 mm/a (standard limit 0.005 mm/a), and copper 1.80×10−5 mm/a (standard limit 0.005 mm/a) tested to JB/T 7901-1999, evaluated against GB/T 50050-2017.

Where the savings actually come from

The fluid is the cheapest part of the bill

A coolant switch gets judged on the price of the drum. The real cost of a corrosive fluid shows up later in maintenance hours, repair bills, replacement fluid, and the downtime around all three. Here’s where the total-cost-of-ownership case actually plays out.

Maintenance
Fewer interventions
No acid washes or annual flushes just a periodic pH and inhibitor-reserve check.
Repairs
No corrosion, no repair bill
Pump seals, heat exchangers and pipework stop being a recurring repair line item.
Replacement
One fill, not four
8 to 10 years in the loop versus 3 to 4 for commodity glycol fewer changeouts, fewer call-outs.
Downtime
The line stays running
Every flush or repair takes the system offline. Removing the cause removes the stoppage.
Illustrative 10-year replacement pattern
Yr 0 Yr 2 Yr 4 Yr 6 Yr 8 Yr 10 Commodity glycol ET-4 Coolant Replace Replace Still running

Illustrative reference case built from our standard 3–4 year (glycol) and 8–10 year (ET-4) service-life figures.

See the documented results

Read the field case studies behind these numbers, or send us your system and we'll tell you honestly whether an ET- grade is a fit.

Scroll to Top